beta
Text
1. Defendant C’s KRW 300,000 to Plaintiff A’s 5% per annum from July 12, 2016 to December 9, 2016.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Facts of recognition 1) Plaintiff A is an apartment complex of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si (hereinafter “instant apartment complex”).
(2) Around January 25, 2016, the Defendant C and the head of the apartment management office of the instant apartment, and the Defendants were the occupants of the instant apartment and the members of the Senior Citizens Association. (2) On January 25, 2016, the apartment management office of the instant apartment, as set forth in paragraph (1) for the reason that the Plaintiff A reduced the subsidy for senior citizens, and was assaulted against the Plaintiff A’s flapsing with the wall.
(2) On January 25, 2016, Defendant D, at around 18:26 on January 25, 2016, 2016, had the Plaintiff B, who was at the end of the 2nd floor of the above management office, sealed the Plaintiff B by hand, and exceeded the wall, and had the Plaintiff go beyond the floor, and she gets the right hand knife for about 2 weeks of treatment (hereinafter “the instant injury”).
A) On the same day, around 18:29, Plaintiff A’s flab, who was seated in the apartment building room of this case, was flabed, flabed, and flabed on the right drinking, etc. (hereinafter “instant second assault”).
(4) On May 13, 2016, Defendant C received a summary order of KRW 500,000,000 due to the instant first assault, and Defendant D received a fine of KRW 1,00,000 due to the instant injury and second assault.
[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1-1 and 4-1, and the purport of the whole pleading
B. According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant C is liable for damages inflicted on Plaintiff A due to the first assault of this case, and Defendant D is liable for damages inflicted on Plaintiff B due to the injury of this case, and for damages inflicted on Plaintiff A due to the second assault of this case.
However, in light of the evidence No. 2, the claim for damages as to the fact that Defendant D filed a complaint against Plaintiff A as a crime of insult, the evidence Nos. 5 and 6 alone is insufficient to acknowledge it, and it is not acceptable as there is no other evidence to acknowledge the assertion of Plaintiff A.
2. Scope of liability for damages [based on recognition] Gap evidence 1-1, 4, 5.