1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants publicly announced the instant examination on June 3, 2015, and the Plaintiff applied for the instant examination on September 5, 2015.

B. On November 6, 2015, the Plaintiff requested the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (hereinafter “Defendant Minister”) to disclose the instant information pursuant to the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”). However, around November 16, 2015, the Defendant Minister rendered a non-disclosure decision on the Plaintiff’s above request for information disclosure, and the Plaintiff received the said non-disclosure decision from the Plaintiff.

C. On November 9, 2015, the Plaintiff visited the Korea Licensed Architects Association on the date of the instant examination to make the employee disclose the Plaintiff’s sexual originals during the instant examination, but the employee of the Korea Licensed Architects Association rejected the request.

On November 11, 2015, the Plaintiff received a written objection from the Korea Certified Architects Association (hereinafter “instant objection”). On December 11, 2015, the Chairperson of the Korea Certified Architects Association (hereinafter “Defendant Chairperson”) received a reply from the Plaintiff to the effect that “The Plaintiff’s response sheet and electronic data processing results are not higher than the result of the response sheet and electronic data processing, and the response sheet and grading criteria are not disclosed in accordance with the Information Disclosure Act and the notice of the proposed examination result.” The Plaintiff received the aforementioned response from the Plaintiff.

On March 29, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendants on March 29, 2016 against the Seoul Eastern District Court 2016Gahap804 that “The Defendant requested the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport to disclose the instant information on the instant examination that was implemented on September 5, 2015, but the said request for disclosure of information was rejected,” and the Seoul East Eastern District Court also filed a lawsuit on November 2016.