beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From July 2014, the Defendant entered the “E Beauty” Ga located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was operated by the Victim C, and there is a house in the Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, and there is a building equivalent to KRW 10 billion in the Seocho-gu, Seoul.
“Along with the independence of the State,” the re-explosive force was over.
The Defendant, during January 2015, in the cosmetic 2015, lives with the victim “E” by raising money to the victim.
In the case of savings in banks, interest shall not be more than 1%.
An investment sea is also investment sea even for a small amount of interest play in this country.
The loan of money shall be paid with the interest of three copies, and if necessary, the principal shall be returned at any time.
B. It made a false statement to the effect that it is possible to provide financing from KRW 100 to KRW 1 billion, and that it is possible to make an investment.
However, since the defendant did not have any property or income, there was no particular property or income, it was thought that he would receive money from the victim to use it as living expenses, and even if he received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay interest normally or return the principal.
Nevertheless, on February 10, 2015, the Defendant was granted KRW 500,000,000 from around 10,000 to June 18, 2015, under the same name as indicated in the list of crimes in the separate sheet between around 22 times and around 22 times, as stated in the list of crimes in the separate sheet.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of the witness C, H, I, and J;
1.Each - Inquiry into the details of liquidity transactions, a statement of transactions, and a written confirmation of each transaction;
1. - A letter of confirmation, a certificate of borrowing.
1. The defendant asserts to the effect that he/she did not have a fraudulent act, and that he/she did not have an intent to obtain fraud.
However, each legal statement of the witness C, H, I, and J is consistent, specific, and inconsistent with other evidence.