Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. A. On April 25, 2012, around 21:56, B, a pharmacy employee B, in front of the F Pharmacy entrance in Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul, on the ground that he/she took an examination against the Defendant, the victim G (Woo, 46 years of age) and the part of the victim’s body part, while in time and in time, was tightly pushed off with the victim’s body part at one time, and the victim’s face part at one time with the victim’s face part at one time, the victim’s eye needs to be treated for about two weeks, and the victim’s eye, strings, and the surrounding eye.

B. Around that time, the victim’s head debt fooms the victim’s head debt by hand, and the victim’s head was moved to the pharmacy, and the victim’s head was frightened by hand before the victim’s entrance at the same pharmacy. Around that time, the victim’s head was frightened by hand, and the victim’s head was frighted and tensiond for about two weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant B removed the head debt from the victim A (here, 54 years of age) at the same time, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, and removed the victim from the cell phone, and the victim was at one time.

In this way, the defendant suffered bodily injury, such as cutting a peltos that require approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of a witness G, H, I, and J;

1. Partial statement of the witness A (as to the defendant B)

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Defendant A among concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendants’ assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Defendant A asserts that only unilaterally assaulted by B, G, H, etc., and Defendant A did not have any fact at the time of B or G.

Defendant

B shall take head from A.