logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.09.28 2017고단6025
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while having no property owned, came to reach a limit on the ability to repay its debts due to a total of KRW 7,00,000, received loans from the Defendant using the so-called -called ---called ---called ---called --- currency loans (the pre-existing loans of the debtor liable for high interest loans are repaid to improve credit rating, allowing them to obtain loans at a relatively lower rate than the pre-existing loans from No. 1 financial institutions, such as banks, etc., and then receiving the full payment and the payment of brokerage fees).

On April 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) in contact with the Defendant’s name in fluencing loan business operators; (b) prepared relevant documents; and (c) temporarily raised the Defendant’s credit by repaying all the Defendant’s debt owed by the Defendant to the Savings Bank Co., Ltd., Ltd.; and (d) loaned KRW 30.5 million from the Defendant’s Savings Bank, Korea Co., Ltd. on May 10, 2016; and (c) agreed to repay KRW 803,737 each month by equal repayment of the principal and interest between

However, in fact, the Defendant raised the Defendant’s credit artificially through the exchange method as above, and paid a large amount of exchange fees with additional loans, and the remainder of the loans was used to repay the previous loans, so there is no property remaining. However, other than the victims, there was no intention or ability to pay the principal and interest that have been borrowed annually through the exchange business entity through the KOB because the Defendant was also liable for the total amount of 810,000 won of the 2 financial rights, such as the Hyundai Savings Bank.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and was transferred to the new bank account (B) in the name of the defendant around May 11, 2016 from the victim who is affiliated with it as above.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow