logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2016.06.29 2015가단8876
토지소유권확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Since the registration of ownership preservation was completed on November 7, 1929 with respect to the instant land, the registration of ownership transfer in the name of Bosung-gun Agriculture Association was transferred on March 194, and the registration of ownership transfer in B on March 22, 1947 (the cause of sale on March 5, 1946) was completed.

(No. 5-7) The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff's father D's father's purchase of this case's land and occupied and cultivated up to himself. Since the above registration of ownership transfer was completed which could have been mistakenly entered in the public register, the plaintiff's ownership confirmation is sought.

2. According to the inquiry reply of each fact-finding reply letter by the Bosung-gun, E, Bosung Police Station, and the National Archives of the Republic of Korea, there is no record about B residing in F in the Jeonsung-gun.

However, at the time of registration of transfer of ownership, the plaintiff (G) is very different from that of the plaintiff's permanent domicile (as the place of birth, the place of death of the deceased H), or from that of the plaintiff's permanent domicile (as the place of birth, the place of death of the deceased H), to register the plaintiff's permanent domicile as his domicile on the register.

Therefore, it is difficult to regard B and the plaintiff as the same person.

The Plaintiff purchased the instant land from the former owner.

Even if there is no evidence to acknowledge it (if there is no evidence to acknowledge it), it cannot be deemed that the plaintiff acquired ownership under the current civil law, which takes the form of the change in real rights, and the plaintiff's claim on the premise

arrow