The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The sentence (one year and six months) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is recognized that the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the punishment and fine for the same crime.

However, the crime of this case is highly harmful in terms of not only overcoming economic damage to a large number of good insurance subscribers by committing the so-called "insurance fraud" but also impairing the trust of the general public on the insurance system, thereby impairing the foundation of the insurance system. Therefore, more severe punishment is required.

The defendant acquired the amount exceeding 280 million won in total over 117 times for a period exceeding 7 years, and the nature of the crime is very heavy.

The Defendant was unable to agree with the victim or recover the damage until the trial of the party.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of the instant case, and the scope of recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.