Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 13, 2013, and September 14, 2013, the defendant listened to about 10 persons, other than D, in front of the head of the Mapo-gu Seoul Building Management Office, Mapo-gu Seoul building D on Sep. 14, 2013. The fact is that the victim E, although there is no fact that he/she has raised money for the period of his/her representative, the victim E is the chairperson of the Dong, it refers to the victim as to how he/she spits down the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the spit of the Gu.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the second protocol of trial;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. A complaint;

1. A investigation report (CCTV);

1. Application of the voice recording CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant asserts that, as stated in the facts charged, there was no awareness that the content was false at the time of speaking as stated in the facts charged, the Defendant used a somewhat exaggerated expression in the process of protesting the victim E’s arbitrary work performance as the same representative, and therefore, the illegality should be avoided as it does not violate the social rules stipulated in Article 20 of the Criminal Act.

In addition, the defendant committed suspicions that he committed an illegal act in relation to accounting as a Dong representative and made a statement on the facts charged to resolve it, which is related to the public interest due to true facts, and even if so, it is not true.