logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.15 2014고단6101
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From September 2012 to October 2012, the Defendant, “2014 Highest 6101,” the Defendant, from around September 2012, 201, would enable the victims C to obtain a loan by means of a payment guarantee from a bank and obtain a loan from D mines as security.

If it is necessary to issue a payment guarantee, 20 million won should be paid as a security deposit, and it will be granted a loan upon issuance of three copies of the guarantee letter of payment of the 3 billion won fake.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

Accordingly, around October 28, 2012, the victim C called the victim E and sent the above remarks from the Defendant, and the Defendant sent the said horses to the victim E through the victim C, after hearing the statement to the effect that “A would receive a loan by receiving one of the Chapter 3 of the letter of guarantee for payment of the 3 billion won bond,” and the Defendant would also receive the victim C’s statement to the effect that “A would receive a loan from the victim E”, and the victim C would receive the victim’s statement to the effect that “I would give one of the letter of guarantee for payment to E, if the E would be paid.”

Around November 23, 2012, the Defendant continued to make a false statement to the effect that “Around November 23, 2012, the Defendant displayed a payment guarantee from a bank to the victims at the mutual infinite coffee shop located in Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and that “A payment guarantee from a bank must be collected at a intervals of KRW 20 million.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the victims, he did not have the intent or ability to receive the loan with the issuance of the payment guarantee, and did not have the fact that he was issued the payment guarantee.

Nevertheless, as seen earlier, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victims and deceiving them from the victims E on October 29, 2012; (b) transferred KRW 3 million on November 2, 2012 to the Defendant’s account in the name of the Defendant through the Victim C; (c) transferred KRW 2 million on November 2, 2012 from the victims C; and (d) transferred KRW 5 million on November 23, 2012 from the victims to the Defendant’s account in the name of the Defendant.

arrow