The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) is that the Defendant did not sell alcoholic beverages or arrange for a loan as stated in the facts charged in the instant case at a singing room operated by the Defendant, but the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① A has consistently made a statement from an investigative agency to the court of the court below to the effect that the Defendant sold the beer and arranged the beer loan in the singing room operated by the Defendant, and the statement was credibility because it is not possible to discover circumstances that make a particularly false statement on the part of the Defendant, and also F’s statement in the court of the court below also conforms to the E’s above statement (the Defendant pointed out that each statement of E and F is inconsistent or inconsistent with the number of persons of beer ander, but it is merely a detailed matter that may cause uncertainty or mistake, on the other hand, that the main part of each of the above statements is considerably consistent, and thus, it is not acceptable to accept the Defendant’s point of view that the Defendant did not have any error in understanding that it was difficult for the police to detect the charges on the part of the Defendant at the time of singing, etc., and that the Defendant did not have any influence on the Defendant’s oral statement or behavior in this case after its arrival.

3. Conclusion.