logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.01.28 2015가합52604
계약무효확인 등 청구의 소
Text

1. It is confirmed that an insurance contract entered in the separate sheet concluded between the Plaintiff and the Selection B is null and void.

2. The plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 29, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant’s designated parties C on December 29, 2009 as the insured (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). Since then, the policyholder entered into the insurance contract with the designated parties D (the Defendant’s husband as the Defendant’s husband), the designated parties C, and the designated parties B (the Defendant’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband) in sequence.

B. Around January 11, 201, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff’s insurance proceeds, as well as hospitalized for 14 days at E Hospital due to the need for dynasium, etc. on January 11, 201, and as indicated in the details of the attached hospitalization, the Defendant was hospitalized for 290 days in total from January 11, 201 to June 24, 2014. Under the instant insurance contract, the Defendant was hospitalized for 2,470,000 won in each hospital. Under the instant insurance contract, the Defendant was paid KRW 2,370,000 in the Selection, KRW 7,370,00 in the Selection, KRW 1,240,00 in the Selection, and KRW 420,00 in the Selection D,

C. The status of the conclusion of each insurance contract with the defendant as the insured and each insurance contract concluded with the defendant as the insured, which is maintained at the time of the conclusion of the instant insurance contract, or which was received from the insurance companies including the plaintiff as the insured events prior to each of the above insurance contracts are as listed below.

A policyholder is currently a policyholder of the monthly payment insurance premium which is the contract date for the name of the company.

The contract was concluded by the designated parties C, D, etc., but most of them were changed to B.

The insured Non-Insurance Proceeds 1 Plaintiff LIG Cplus II Insurance on December 29, 2009, 68,000 Defendant A 11,50,000, 200 Gappp Business Comprehensive Insurance on December 29, 2009, Defendant A 19,500,000 Defendant A 19,500,000 Mazzz self-confluss Policy on December 29, 2009, and 45,000 Defendant A4 Mcz and Fire Al Maz and Fire Al Mabz and Fire Mablus Policy on December 48, 2009, Defendant A4 Mcz and Fire Mablus Policy on December 29, 200, Defendant A5 Han Plus Policy on December 29, 200, Defendant A200 No. 509, May 29, 2005

arrow