The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant in the instant charges is a person engaging in driving a car of DK3.

around 09:55 on October 19, 2015, the Defendant was proceeding at a speed below the north-west speed from the west to the west of the west-gu, Haban-gun, Haban-gun, Haban-gun, at the right speed.

At this point, as an intersection of a three-distance road in the market, in which pedestrians, off-to-land and vehicles are expected to be able to proceed on the right-hand side of the proceeding direction, there is a duty of care to temporarily stop a vehicle before entering the intersection or to prevent accidents by reducing the speed in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded to the left-hand side of the victim E(the age of 81) driving on the right-hand side of the proceeding direction, which led to a shock of the left-hand side of the victim E(the age of 81) driving.

Ultimately, due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant suffered serious injury to the extent that normal life could be impossible on the part of the victim, on the ground that the victim was suffering from a 8-day surgery under one-time therapy, and that there was no open wound.

2. Determination

(a) Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents provides that the driver of a traffic accident shall be covered by a comprehensive insurance policy in cases where the victim is at risk of life due to bodily injury or the victim becomes imprisoned or suffers from incurable or incurable disease

Even if there is a provision that prosecution can be instituted.

Therefore, we examine whether the present situation of the victim falls under the "risk, unknown, incurable or incurable disease" of the victim.

B. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor and the results of the fact-finding inquiry conducted by the G Hospital of this court, the victim is under the influence of the instant case.