logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.11.02 2017고정64
부정수표단속법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

around August 10, 2000, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the branch office of the Bank of Korea and traded household checks under the name of the Defendant.

1. On August 2016, the Defendant issued one copy of the bank household check in the name of the Defendant, which became “E”, “E”, “1 November 20, 2016”, and “3 million won” in the face value of D offices located in Jinju-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, 2016.

On November 21, 2016, the holder of the check presented payment to the above bank on November 21, 2016, but did not pay for the shortage of deposit.

2. On August 2016, the Defendant issued one copy of the household check in the name of the Defendant, which was named as “F”, “F”, “date of issuance”, and “three million won” at the face value of the said D office.

On November 21, 2016, the holder of the check presented payment to the above bank on November 21, 2016, but did not pay for the shortage of deposit.

3. On August 2016, the Defendant issued one copy of the household check in the name of the Defendant, which was named as “G”, “G”, “date of issuance”, and “3 million won” in the face value, at the office located in Daegu.

On December 12, 2016, the holder of the check presented payment to the above bank on December 12, 2016, but did not pay it as the suspension of transaction.

around August 10, 2000, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the branch of the Bank of Korea in the name of the Defendant and traded household checks.

On August 2016, the Defendant purchased a single bill from the I in Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, and issued a copy of the check number J, the par value of 3 million won, and the Defendant’s household check in the name of the above Industrial Bank of Korea under the name of the Defendant on January 20, 2017. On January 20, 2017, the Defendant presented that K would pay the check on January 20, 2017, within the payment period.

However, the Defendant did not pay for the termination of the check contract.

The defendant, including this, shall extend to eight times as shown in the list of offenses in the attached Form.

arrow