Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 20, 2013, at around 02:15, Defendant A driven D NewG vehicles at the influence of alcohol level of 0.161% (Yil Daily %) at approximately 3 km from the sea water station located in the Seocho-gu in Busan East-dong, Seoban-dong, to the front day of the So-gu So-gu, Busan Metropolitan City Agricultural City.

2. Defendant B, at around 11:00 on June 21, 2013, knew of the fact that Defendant A committed a crime that constitutes a fine or heavier punishment due to drinking, as stated in the above paragraph (1), at the Busan Coast Guard Office located in the Busan Coast Guard Station, the Busan Coast Guard Office located in the Busan Coast Guard 9dong, but he made a false statement by means of false statement, such as making a false statement that the Defendant driven by an assistant E belonging to the above police station who is investigating the instant case, and let the offender escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G and H;

1. A verification protocol (CCTV image);

1. Each police statement concerning B;

1. B Statement of traffic accident;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographic acts and subordinate statutes by cutting down traffic accidents, traffic accident reports, reports on the occurrence of a traffic accident, reports on the status of driving at home, reports on the driving at home, inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving, investigation reports (in respect ofCCTV images, etc.), final stopping places,

1. Defendant A: Articles 148-2(2)2 and 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act; Articles 151(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 151(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 151(1) and 151(1) of the Criminal Act; the Defendants and the defense counsel’s assertion of the Defendants and the defense counsel regarding the above D New GG vehicle at the time of the instant case asserted that the persons driving the above D New GG vehicle is not Defendant A, but Defendant B. However, according to the above evidence, the above assertion is rejected since the person driving the above vehicle as stated in the above

The reason for sentencing is that the defendants denied the crime of this case, and the sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case are considered.