A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 02:40 on February 22, 2017, the Defendant demanded a refund of the right to use a letter or the right to use a letter to the victim E (hereinafter referred to as 56 years old) at the “D Gaba,” located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul, for the purpose of 02:40 on February 22, 2017, and the Defendant demanded a refund of the 8,500 won to the victim on the ground that he/she avoided the refund of KRW 8,50,000.

D. The 30 minutes of the disturbance, such as her bath and her book, was avoided, so that other customers could not enter the disturbance.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's privacy or business by force.

around 01:20 on May 7, 2017, the Defendant intruded with the entrance opened at the house of the victim G located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul around 01:20 on May 7, 2017, and stolen the victim's age 100,000 won, holding an 10,000 won, at that location.

Summary of Evidence

[17] Height 1132]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to E [17 order, 2263];

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. G statements;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of the CCTV image data at the scene of a crime, and the provisions of Acts and subordinate statutes to the CCTV image data at the mobile route after the crime is committed;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order and Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the crime is not less light in light of the circumstances and contents of each of the instant crimes, the defendant has been punished several times, such as violent crimes or larcenys, etc. Meanwhile, the defendant confessions and reflects each of the instant crimes, and the defendant appears to have committed contingent crimes under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime interfering with the instant business, and it appears that he did not intrude into the indoor residential space at the time of the instant larceny crime.