The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) sentenced by the court below (one year and nine months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The fact that the defendant is against his mistake, the fact that the victim E partly recovers from the damage by paying 64 million won to the victim E, the family situation is difficult due to the fact that there is a family member to support the defendant, and there is no penalty.

However, each of the crimes of this case is that the defendant deceptions victim E to borrow money or obtains precious metals under the name of E, and does not pay credit card price by re-issuance of five credit cards in the name of E, or obtains loans and mobile phone use fees by forging and using a loan contract and mobile phone in the name of E, by deceiving the victim U, by deceiving the victim U, by deceiving the victim, by deceiving the victim, and by deceiving the victim, and by deceiving the victim, and by working as the head of an entertainment drinking house and arranging commercial sex acts, etc. for business in the entertainment drinking house, and the crime is not good, and the crime is not committed; for the victim E, the total fraud amount of the defendant reaches KRW 90 million; for the victim E, the defendant has repeatedly acquired money through 3 to 4 months using personal trust relationship with the above victim; for the victim E, the victim E suffered big damage due to the occurrence of the crime, and the act of arranging commercial sex has not been punished by the investigation agency for a considerable period of 2 years or more after the occurrence of the victim's sexual traffic, and has been punished by the E-related investigation agency.