1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including those resulting from the participation, shall be all included.

On May 16, 1978, the plaintiff A, who is a member of the party concerned with the decision of the reexamination of this case by using 70 full-time workers on May 16, 1978, who is a member of the plaintiff: the plaintiff B: the plaintiff Eul on September 21, 2001, who is a driver of the plaintiff on July 28, 2003: the plaintiff A: the head of the si branch office C of the National Public Transport Services Trade Union (hereinafter "the trade union of this case") shall be referred to as the "branch

Plaintiff B: On August 12, 2013, the date of determination of the first inquiry tribunal by the president of the branch of this case and the purport of applying for dismissal of the application by the Plaintiffs and the trade union of this case.

1. The Intervenor recognizes that the Plaintiff’s act of absence from work and wage deduction (hereinafter “first act”) is an unfair labor practice on the grounds that the Intervenor refused to give instructions to Plaintiff A through mobile phone text messages from February 19, 201 to March 15, 201, and from June 15, 2011 to June 14, 2013.

2. From August 2, 2011 to March 15, 2013 with respect to Plaintiff A, and from August 2, 2011 to June 14, 2013 with respect to Plaintiff B, the Intervenor’s removal of the card settlement machine and call function (hereinafter “credit card settlement machine, etc.”) of the taxi operated by the Plaintiffs from August 2, 201 to June 14, 2013 (hereinafter “Class 2”) recognizes that the Plaintiff is an unfair labor practice.

3. Despite the Plaintiff’s request for continued work, the Intervenor’s retirement process at the age limit of the Plaintiff A as of March 16, 2013 (hereinafter “third act”) recognizes that the Plaintiff’s retirement process was unfair dismissal and unfair labor practices.

4. The intervenor would pay the amount equivalent to the wages that could have been received if the intervenor provided work normally to the plaintiffs.

5. An intervenor shall attach 365 days to five newspapers, such as a dispatch room, bulletin board, and static door, in which the facts of unfair dispatch, unfair dismissal and unfair labor practice and the promise to prevent the recurrence have been entered.

On November 12, 2013, the date of the decision on review, the plaintiffs and the trade union's rejection of the application for review of the instant trade union. (1) The plaintiffs' actions comply with the order to perform their ordinary duties.