1. The Defendant’s payment order issued on November 21, 2016 in Seoul Western District Court Decision 2016 tea 83100 against the Plaintiff.

In full view of the following facts: (a) the total amount of claims, the amount of the Defendant’s claim confirmation, the interval between the Defendant’s claim occurrence and the time of immunity, and the Plaintiff’s motive to exempt only the Defendant’s obligation to the Defendant is not discovered at the time of the decision of immunity acknowledged by the respective statements in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including additional numbers); and (b) the fact of claim entry in the annexed sheet is recognized. Therefore, the Defendant’s enforcement based on the payment order issued on November 21, 2016 against the Plaintiff should not be denied, and the Plaintiff’s claim of this case shall be accepted for the reasons, and the costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each party, and it is so decided as per Disposition.