(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.11.01 2018가합1703

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.11.01 2018가합1703

추심금

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 274,452,054 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from April 26, 2018 to November 1, 2018; and (b) for the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff’s claim 1 against the Plaintiff’s limited liability company C is against the limited liability company C, and the notary public, from July 1, 2017 to July 2017, 2018, the former Jeju District Court 2018 other 1482 claims attachment and collection order, 2018, the expiration date of the principal of the claim based on the original copy of the No. 230 of the No. 2017, the No. 2017, the No. 2000,00, and the delay damages, and the delay damages.

2.23. There shall be claims for delay damages until 23.

(2) On June 30, 2017, Article 6-3 of the said Notarial Deed Co., Ltd., a non-party limited liability company of the No. 230 of the No. 2017 No. 30 of the said No. 317, Jul. 31, 2017; KRW 60 million on August 31, 2017; and KRW 60,000,000 on September 30, 2017; and KRW 60,000,000 on September 30, 2017; however, even though the two notary public agreed to make installment payments of KRW 30,00,00 on September 30, 2017, the non-party limited liability company did not perform the said agreement.

B. The Defendant’s debt against C is obligated to enter into a contract for the construction of reinforced concrete to a limited liability company C, and pay to the limited liability company C the construction cost of KRW 74,756,000 as the construction cost.

C. On February 27, 2018, the Plaintiff: (a) requested the Jeonju District Court 2018 Other Bonds 1482 and a collection order with respect to the claim for construction price against the Defendant of the limited liability company C as the preserved right; and (b) obtained the order of seizure and collection on February 28, 2018; and (c) the said order was served on the Defendant on February 28, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, and Eul evidence 4 shall include various numbers.

hereinafter the same shall apply.

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant's collection amount of KRW 274,452,054 = 250.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원안양지원 2019.01.24 2018가단4961

-전주지방법원 2019.01.09 2018가합1925

-인천지방법원부천지원 2019.08.21 2018가단121853

-대전지방법원천안지원 2019.02.13 2018가단9964

-전주지방법원 2016.06.22 2015가단29666