A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 6, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) on the road in front of a public parking lot, in the front of the public parking lot by the Jin-gun, Jin-gun, Jin-gun around 19:50, and the Defendant’s D co-owned trucking around 18 km from the above place to the roads in front of the same Gun under the influence of alcohol level of 0.203% during blood alcohol level. In driving the Defendant’s D co-owned trucking around 18 km from the above place to the roads in front of the same Gun, the Defendant was able to easily drive the above vehicle by carrying the Defendant’s smart key to assist the driving.

2. On July 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the performance of official duties; (b) brought a disturbance out of the said vehicle due to G while demanding that the Defendant, as described in paragraph (1), was subject to the crackdown from the victim’s police officer F (48 years old), etc., who is the police officer of the Speaker-gu Police Station E commander of the police station, who was called out by the Defendant, who was driven under drinking on the road in front of Gyeong-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeong-gun, 2017, as described in paragraph (1) and tried to drive the vehicle described in paragraph (1) while under the influence of alcohol.

The defendant continued to sit again in the driver's seat of the above vehicle and turn on the start and drive the vehicle, the victim gets off the driver's seat and let the defendant get off the vehicle.

The Defendant: (a) caused the victim’s arms to be pushed against the victim’s arms, and (b) caused the vehicle to move slowly due to the slope, and (c) caused the driver’s seat door to the driver’s seat door, and followed the driver’s seat door to the victim’s kneeel.

As a result, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with their legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports, and at the same time, the victim injured the victim, including the left-hand knee, who requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F, H, and I;

1. A statement in the circumstances of a person who is on the duty of driving at home;