(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.03.09 2016고단84

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.03.09 2016고단84

위증교사

Text

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged was assaulted by the Defendant on August 24, 2013 on the face of the victim G (the age of 23) in front of the Felel located in Ansan-si on the ground that the Defendant does not drink and play as he or she would drink as his or her own in his or her mother house, and assault the victim G on the face of his or her right side, continuing to take approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim H (the age of 27) reported this situation to the police at the same time and at the same place, on the ground that he or she reported the victim H (the age of 27) on this situation to the police, and spits down the victim’s left part-hand part and spit the spit on the chest and head.

Then, while denying the facts charged that the Defendant was tried in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.) (hereinafter “Defendant case”), etc. (hereinafter “instant case”), the Daegu District Court No. 2014No. 2068) due to the said act, the Defendant asked the Defendant to the effect that he was unable to give testimony to the victims, such as the Defendant’s refusal to give rise to the Defendant, and that he was unable to go back to the G, and that he was unable to give rise to two times the left-hand side of H. as of April 2015.

Accordingly, on April 16, 2015, I appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the above defendant's case in Daegu Suwon-gu District Court 202, a new official of the High District Court Dang-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, as of April 16, 2015. In fact, the defendant was committing assault against G, such as having collected Park Kascick, and having been aware of the fact that I had observed it on the spot and had been well aware of this fact, I, during the examination of the witness in the above case, "A was found to have been faced by Defendant A with G.

At the time, not only the defendant but also the person who was scars sick while working on the defendant.

“I did not have any example to the question “.......”

“............” and the prosecutor.

참조조문

-폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2015.10.22 2015고단3324

-대구지방법원 2015.05.14 2014노2068

-창원지방법원 거창지원 2015.11.25 2015재고단5

-창원지방법원 2015.01.13 2013고단1802

-대구지방법원 2017.06.15 2016고단6127