The judgment below

Of them, the part against Defendant C shall be reversed.

Defendant

C. The Defendant A and B’s appeal are all not guilty.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by Defendant A and B (misunderstanding of facts and legal principles) with respect to registering the professors who did not participate in the work of the books of “AC” (hereinafter “the books of this case”), Defendant B does not have consented to the registration as the author of the books of this case, and Defendant B does not constitute a joint principal offender since the subjective requirements and objective requirements of the joint principal offender are not satisfied.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which convicted the charged facts of this case is erroneous by misunderstanding facts or by misunderstanding legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. On April 14, 2017, Defendant C received a notice of receipt of the records of trial from this court, but failed to submit a statement of reasons for appeal within 20 days, which is the period for submission of the reasons for appeal. Although the petition of appeal does not contain the reasons for appeal, it is examined ex officio as to mistake of facts.

A. This part of the facts charged