logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.15 2013가합525576
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Plaintiff A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, H, J, K, M, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, M, T, U, X, Y, Y, Z, AAB, AC, AC, AD, AE, AE, AF, AH, and AI.

Reasons

In full view of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence 3-2, 7, 8, and 8-8, Gap evidence 10-5, Gap evidence 11-3, and Eul evidence 12-6 as to the legitimacy of the plaintiffs' lawsuits as stated in paragraph (1) of this Article, the whole purport of the arguments is acknowledged as follows: plaintiff H on December 26, 1953; plaintiff I on October 15, 1937; the plaintiff K on May 3, 1952; the plaintiff Eul on December 23, 1984; the plaintiff Eul on June 25, 199; the plaintiff Eul on February 5, 198; the plaintiff Eul on December 6, 194; the plaintiff on December 16, 194; the plaintiff on December 19, 197; the plaintiff on June 17, 195; the plaintiff on June 19, 197.

Therefore, the above plaintiffs' lawsuit is unlawful because it was filed by the deceased person before the lawsuit is filed.

On the other hand, although the defendant is dissatisfied with the existence of the right of attorney, the plaintiff's attorney does not submit documents such as the certificate of personal seal impression or identification to explain that he has been granted the right of attorney by the plaintiff A, C, D, E, F, G, J, M, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, R, M, U, V, X, X, Y, Z, AB, AC, AD, AE, AE, AJ, AM, AM, and AO until the conclusion of the argument in this case. Thus, it is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff's attorney was granted the right of attorney from the above plaintiffs. Among the lawsuit in this case, the part concerning the plaintiffs in this case is unlawful as it was filed by a person who has no right of attorney.

(B) The “Plaintiffs” as referred to in Article 11(1) of the former Act refers to the Plaintiffs, other than the Plaintiffs, against which the filing of the suit is unlawful as above, and the Defendant created the 11st group of the National Armed Forces for the purpose of prompt dispersion in the future area around August 27, 1950, when the 625 War was pending, and the 20 group of the 11th proviso of the said Act was carried out as soon as possible from October 7, 1950 to March 31, 1951.

In a situation where it is difficult to distinguish between civilians and as soon as possible, the 11st armed forces force shall be as soon as possible with civilians.

arrow