A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 30, 2007, the defendant was issued a summary order of 700,000 won by the Suwon District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of 2.5 million won by a fine at the Seoul Northern District Court on February 19, 2009 for the same crime.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the NAS vehicle B.

1. On October 7, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents: (a) drive the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.080% on blood alcohol level on October 7, 2014; (b) led the Defendant to turn to the left at a speed that is difficult to know on the 5th side of the Sincheon-gu five complex in the Sincheon-gu, Oran-gu, Oran City four complexes.

Since it is intended to turn to the left to enter the road within the apartment complex, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by making the front and rear left turn to the road-centered side of the person engaged in the driving of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to the left immediately from the road-centered level while under the influence of alcohol as seen above, and caused the front part of the Drupp vehicle driven by the victim C (IS, 39 years old) who was driving in the apartment complex in the direction of the apartment complex, to the front part of the driving seat of the above vehicle.

After all, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury to the chills and tensions that require approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and the injury to the chills E (the third and third years of age) of head parts in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

2. Although the Defendant had been punished twice for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) as stated in the above criminal records, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.080% from a section of about 200 meters from the 4 complex parking lot in the temporary light as described in paragraph (1) to the entrance of an apartment house, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.080%.