1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The party's assertion that the plaintiff did not conclude a B analysis consulting contract under which the defendant and the defendant should pay a certain percentage of the successful bid price to the defendant as a successful fee (hereinafter "the contract in this case"), but the defendant applied for a payment order and received a payment order for the service price under the contract in this case.

On May 14, 2010, the Defendant entered into the instant contract with the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Busan Metropolitan Office of Education on June 22, 2010 for the expansion of the elevator rooms for disabled persons and other construction works through the information on the successful bid price provided by the Defendant. Thus, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay KRW 4,390,206 to the Defendant with the contingent remuneration.

2. On May 14, 2010, the plaintiff provided information on the successful bid price awarded by the defendant (title B) and the defendant. The plaintiff participates in the bid by providing information on the successful bid price awarded by the defendant to the defendant, 2% of less than 50 million won, 1.5% of the successful bid price awarded by the defendant, and 1.5% of the total amount of 1.5% of the 1.5% of the 5 billion won (in full view of the respective entries in the contract, Gap evidence No. 5-1 through 3, Eul evidence No. 6 through 8, 12, and 12, and the whole purport of the arguments, and the whole purport of the arguments, as a whole, the plaintiff entered into the contract in this case with the defendant under the above contract with the Busan Metropolitan City Office of Education as a successful tender price contract with the defendant, and the plaintiff is obligated to pay the plaintiff the 1.5% of the 1.5% of the 1.5% of the 5 billion won and the 1.5% of the 1.4.5 billion won of the above contract.20