logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.05.31 2017고정772
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

Each of the instant public prosecutions is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The facts charged in this case

A. On December 14, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) was unable to receive the construction cost remaining from the victim C in the Defendant’s residence located in Daegu-gu B and 502, and was replaced by fraud, which was replaced by the Defendant, on the Internet’s website bulletin board, for the purpose of slandering the said victim.

The president is the vice president, and the husband of all the affairs is the husband.

absolute Ma000 Ma00

Full bad quality.

“The victim’s reputation was undermined by stating the fact that it was “.”

B. Around April 5, 2016, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s residence above the Defendant, intends to make a compulsory appearance by changing the name “E” into the name “D” bulletin board.

쇠鹬도요

G The application for the business, such as the E two annual heads of the interest claim

It is absolute Maviso.

“Publicly insulting the said victim by posting a letter of “”.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 70(1) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. and Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention and offense subject to prosecution on complaint: Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act;

C. In the event that the indictment of this case was not filed, the withdrawal of the complaint of the victim C, the agreement, and the statement that the defendant would not be punished, and the statement that the withdrawal of the complaint of this case will be revoked, are submitted respectively.

(d) Judgment dismissing each public prosecution: subparagraphs 5 and 6 of Article 327 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow