The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in light of the overall sentencing conditions in light of the gist of the grounds for appeal.

2. It is recognized that there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant was the first offender, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and that the money acquired by deception was used most by the former husband, and that there are some circumstances to consider the circumstances of the crime.

However, in full view of the various sentencing conditions of Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too large to be unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is not reasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.