beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B shall be KRW 114,053,00 and 20% per annum from March 28, 2013 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Defendant C, as an individual business operator who registered his/her business in the name of “D”, was awarded a contract for the Friju-gun Friet Construction Work from E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”), and on May 16, 201, between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff entered into the subcontract (hereinafter “instant contract”).
According to the instant contract, the Plaintiff paid at his own expense the amount of a tree wage and equipment, and sold and disposed of the timbered raw trees to others, and paid to D the amount of KRW 18,00 per ton for pine trees, KRW 8,000 per ton for pine trees, KRW 8,00 per ton for pine trees, and KRW 68,00 per ton for disciplinary items.
(B) The difference between the sale price to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant C is the difference between the sale price to others and the sale price to be paid to the defendant C.
According to the contract of this case, the Plaintiff invested KRW 114,053,00 in total as the amount of the set-off wage and the equipment cost, and carried out the set-off work.
On June 21, 201, the Gangwon-do Office issued an order to suspend the construction of this case to E on the ground that the mountain scambling, which was worked at the construction site of this case by Gangwon-do Office, did not transplant the mountain scambling, which is an environmentally 2-class protected tree in the Do to another place, and damaged the mountain scambling life zone by force during the forest scaming operations, and thereafter, E rescinded rescinded the construction contract with Defendant C and suspended the construction of this case, and the Plaintiff failed to remove the scambling trees from the construction site of this case.
C. On May 2012, 2012, in order to prevent a disaster and environmental pollution, the prime city requested E to remove raw timber and forest waste in the site of this case from the site of this case, and the Defendant C to remove them to the Defendant C. The Defendant C discontinued the business of Defendant BD, the representative director of which is the Defendant BD.