The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the absence of the fact that the Defendant shouldered or mashed Category C’s her sonm or ear, and that he saw or spawned E, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

B. The misapprehension of the legal principle is merely a civil fact of C and E, but this is a legitimate act because C, E, and F three persons assaulted the Defendant, which constitutes a legitimate act.

C. The lower court’s sentencing (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts: (i) at an investigative agency and the court below, C has consistently stated that the defendant was aware of C's face and face, ear, ear, and ear while she takes a bath, and that E and F have consistently followed E at this time; (ii) at an investigative agency and the court below of edo, the defendant shouldered C's face and ear, ear, and necked, followed E again, and made a statement corresponding thereto to this, in order to oppose E again because the defendant was unsatisfyd, and the defendant stated in F also at the court below that the defendant was at the time of the crime, including (iii) the defendant's satisfying of C's ear and satch, and the price of satisfy with its own neck, and (iv) the degree of injury and satisfy in case of satch, five (7) days of satisfy.