logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.09.10 2015고단1945
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business with the trade name “D” from C and 4 in Si interesting City.

No one shall engage in sexual traffic or arrange to engage in sexual traffic in return for receiving or promising to receive money, valuables or other property benefits from unspecified persons.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) directed, during the course of leaving a room, the customer who was found in the “D” while the Defendant was employed by a marina branch office, and (b) directed the female employee to enter into the said room; (c) accordingly, around May 27, 2015, the Defendant received 100,000 won as the price for commercial sex acts from F, a customer, and directed him/her as the price for commercial sex acts; and (d) ordered G, a female employee, to have a sexual intercourse with the customer.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with E to arrange sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Application of statutes governing field control photographs;

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. for the crimes, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] there is no person who has no basic area (4 to 10 months) (4 to 10 months) of the first type of sexual traffic crimes subject to the age of 19 or older, such as brokerage of sexual traffic, etc. [the decision of sentence] [the defendant has been punished for a fine of KRW 4 million for the same kind of crime in 2014 and again committed the crime of this case at the same place of business in light of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case again at the same place of business, it is deemed that a strict punishment is necessary for the defendant. However, the defendant committed the crime of this case; the defendant closed down the place of the crime of this case, which is the place of the crime of this case after the crime of this case; the defendant closed down the place of the crime of this case; the defendant's motive, age of the defendant

arrow