logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.05.09 2011가합53046
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant B and C shall each of the Plaintiff KRW 702,100,000 and 5% per annum from May 1, 2006 to June 10, 201.

Reasons

1. On February 24, 2006, the Defendants (Defendant B and C) prepared a false contract, etc. as if Defendant B had the right to use the instant land in KRW 670 million with Defendant D, and intended to obtain money from the victim A (Plaintiff) as a resale price, and made a false sales contract for the said land around February 24, 2006.

Then, from January 2006 to February 2006, the Defendants expressed the aforementioned false contract, etc. with the victim at the H market Fdong branch office and the H market I located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H market H market G, and at the real estate office in Gyeonggi-gu I, the said false contract, etc., and concluded that “The Defendant purchased the right to use the land for the land of 14 parcels, other than Chuncheon, in the amount of KRW 670,000,000 per square year, in which B purchased the right to use the land for 300,000 won per square year, and would be able to receive 21 million won from the Korea hydroelectric Power Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea hydroelectric Power”).”

However, Defendant B did not purchase the right to use the above land in KRW 670 million, and the right to use the above land is, in principle, impossible, and the Defendants did not have the intention or ability to cause the victim to be deprived of the above land from the Korean hydroelectric power plant.

The Defendants received from the victim a total of KRW 68 million around February 28, 2006, KRW 267 billion around March 15, 2006, KRW 200 million around April 10, 2006, KRW 135 million around April 13, 2006, KRW 31 million around April 14, 2006, and KRW 1.1 million around April 14, 2006, and KRW 1.1 billion around April 14, 2006.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim to receive the goods.

Under the involvement of Defendant B and C, the Plaintiff purchased the right to use the land (hereinafter “instant right to use the land”) against the F and fourteen parcels outside Chuncheon City.

Defendant B and C had deceiving the Plaintiff in its process.

arrow