1. No. 742, which was signed by D Law Firm on April 30, 2018 by the Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiffs, No. 742.

1. On April 30, 2018, the fact that the Plaintiffs’ judgment on the cause of the claim was made by a notary public to the Defendant on April 30, 2018 as the No. 742 of D Law Firm Deed No. 2018 (hereinafter “instant No. notarial deed”), but the Defendant did not pay the Plaintiffs a loan of KRW 150 million as stated in the said No. notarial deed to the Defendant does not conflict between the parties.

According to the above facts, since there is no defendant's claim based on the notarial deed of this case, compulsory execution based on the notarial deed of this case should be denied.

2. If so, the plaintiffs' claims are reasonable, and all of them are accepted. It is so decided as per Disposition.