1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the pertinent part is modified or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts used or added;

A. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the “founded ground for recognition” column 12 of the second part of the judgment shall add “A evidence 1-2 to “7”.

B. Of the written judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the third to seventh is examined as follows.

(1) The director of the construction company’s site is an employee who has been delegated with the specific type of business or specific matters under Article 15 of the Commercial Act, and has a partial comprehensive power of attorney with respect to such business, and the contractor is granted a wide range of authority to enter into a subcontract agreement on a large scale of construction works and a lease agreement on equipment required for such construction works, and payment of the cost therefor, etc. (Supreme Court Decision 94Da20884 delivered on September 30, 1994). If the contractor of the construction contractor, who has subcontracted the construction works to another person and had another person act with the contractor as the on-site manager dispatched the subcontractor to the construction site under the Commercial Act when performing the construction works, the contractor cannot be exempted from liability as the nominal owner under the Commercial Act (Supreme Court Decision 83Meu1018 delivered on February 26, 1985).

C. Of the text of the first instance judgment, “from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012” in the 4th sentence of the first instance judgment shall be applied “from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012.”

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.