logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.13 2017고정2886
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 1:54 on June 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the Defendant’s house located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Seoul”); (b) despite the fact that the Victim C had not disguiseded his educational background, the Defendant’s ability to “E” refers to the Victim C after having access to the Internet D website using a mobile phone; and (c) had four people with the ability to “E” in the article of “E”; (d) the past was the same as the 3rd anniversary of South Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of

“In inserting the text of “a statement”, the victim’s reputation was undermined by inserting open information through the information and communications network.

In addition, from around that time to December 26, 2016, the Defendant posted comments on the victim’s comments on three occasions in total, such as the list of crimes attached hereto, and damaged the honor of the victim by openly disclosing facts through the information and communications network for the purpose of slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Recording notes of the examination of the H in relation to H;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A list of comments comments on the preparation of IDs for the year;

1. Each police investigation report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on certificates of conferment of degrees and registered certificates;

1. Article 70(1) of the Act on Promotion of the Utilization of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. for Criminal Facts and Article 70(1) of the Act on Promotion of the Selection of Punishment, etc. for Specific Crimes and Selection of Fines [The Defendant, who is aware that the victimized person was a disguised person by his/her graduation from the F large scale, made a statement to the effect that he/she raised a strong suspicion on the said academic background, and that he/she made a statement on the part of the injured person’s social value.

arrow