A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of five months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three-year imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, on the 20th of the same month, and the sentence became final and conclusive on the 20th of the same month. On April 28, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents at the Daegu District Court on the 20th of the same month, and is still pending in the final appeal trial.

1. The Defendant’s violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) is apparent that the Defendant is a clerical error in the facts charged on January 7, 2019, as stated in paragraph (1) of the facts charged on January 7, 2020, and thus ex officio correction is made.

1.7. Around 16:45, at approximately 5 km from the Do of the merchants' consent to the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government, the driver was driving the B body-man car without obtaining a driver's license in the section of about 5 km.

2. Around 15:00 on January 16, 2020, the Defendant visited the Daegu Southern Police Station C Team of the Daegu Southern-dong, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and prepared a written statement of the occurrence of a traffic accident, and then, on January 7, 2020, the Defendant entered his name D, resident registration number E, occupationless and jobless, and the column of the occurrence of the traffic accident with a black pen, and signed “D” following the statement’s name after entering “D” in the column of the occurrence of the traffic accident.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of the statement in the name of D, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

3. At the time and place specified in Paragraph 2, the Defendant sent the forged statement to the AssistantF in charge of C Team of the Daegu Southern Police Station C Team at the Daegu Southern Police Station, who is aware of the forgery, as if the document was duly formed.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised a forged private document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning G and D;

1. The report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and the forgery of a de facto investigation report is made in the name of D.