1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,647,70 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from June 16, 2015 to February 17, 2017.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) A project approval and announcement - A project name: A public announcement of an implementation plan for an urban planning facility project (hereinafter referred to as “project in this case”): A public announcement of the approval of an implementation plan for an urban planning facility project on February 6, 2014 (C) and the public announcement of the approval of an implementation plan for an urban planning facility project on May 19, 2014 (D), the public announcement of the designation of the project implementer for an urban planning facility project on May 29, 2014, the public announcement of the designation of the project implementer for an implementation plan for an urban planning facility project on May 29, 2014 (e) and the correction of the approval of an implementation plan for an implementation plan on May 29, 2014 (e) E), the public announcement of the designation of the project implementer for urban planning facility

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on April 24, 2015 (hereinafter “the instant ruling of expropriation”): The land subject to expropriation is indicated in the column for “adjudication of expropriation” in the table of Attached Table 1 attached to the Plaintiff’s attached Table 1, stating that: (a) 2,188 square meters and 1/2 shares in six parcels, respectively (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”; and (b) - Compensation for any obstacle on each of the above land: (c) - Compensation for losses on June 15, 2015; (d) - Compensation for land: KRW 97,412,450 (d) below) in the table of Attached Table 1 attached to the Plaintiff’s ownership.

(2) Compensation for obstacles: 39,874,250 won (the number of obstacles described in attached Form 2 shall be 1 through 8 from among the 39,874,250 won (the number of livestock penss, 4, 1 lodging house, one outdoor warehouse, one toilet, one water tank, one water tank, and 1 through 8);

- An appraisal corporation: B&D appraisal corporation and E-won appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”)

A person shall be appointed.

C. The Central Land Tribunal made an objection on September 17, 2015 (hereinafter “instant objection”) - The content of the adjudication: The Plaintiff’s rejection of objection - An appraisal corporation and the Pacific Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “instant appraisal”)

D. As a result of the court’s appraisal, H, an appraiser of this Court, refers to the court’s appraisal, i.e., the pertinent amount of adequate compensation for losses with respect to each land of this case, from 1 to 7.