Text
1. The plaintiff A’s -
(a) Obligations No. 1 of the attached Table 1 against Defendant Telecommunications Korea Loan Co., Ltd.;
(b) the defendant.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. C, without the Plaintiff’s consent or consent, opened the mobile phone under the Plaintiff’s name, and then, a credit service company, Defendant C, Defendant C, and Defendant C, by phoneing to the mobile phone and providing the document under the Plaintiff’s name as if it were the Plaintiff A, deceiving the said Defendants by forging and providing the document under the Plaintiff’s name, and concluded a loan agreement with the said Defendants Nos. 1 and 2 as shown in the separate sheet and received the loan.
B. On October 2, 2014, C, using the Plaintiff’s resident registration certificate that was stolen on or around October 2, 2014, opened a financial account under the Plaintiff B’s name and obtained an authorized certificate, and then, C, a credit business company, which entered into a loan agreement with the said Defendants and Nonparty Company No. 3 through No. 15 with the said Defendants and Nonparty Company, by deceiving the said Defendants by filing an application for a loan as if they were the Plaintiff B.
On the other hand, on July 30, 2015, the non-party company transferred the claim under the loan agreement No. 8 of the attached Table to the social loan company that Defendant Apropha conducted on July 30, 2015, and notified the plaintiff B of the transfer on February 29, 2016.
[Based on the recognition] Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act (as to Defendant 1 and Defendant 2, Defendant 2 and Defendant 3, Defendant 2 and Defendant 3, Defendant 2 and Defendant 3, Defendant 2 and Defendant 3, Defendant 2 and Defendant 3, Defendant 2 and Defendant 3, Defendant 3 and Defendant 4, Defendant 3 and Defendant 4, Defendant 3 and Defendant 4, Defendant 3 and Defendant 4, Defendant 3 and Defendant 4, Defendant 3 and Defendant 4, Defendant 3 and Defendant 4)
2. Determination.