logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014.01.29 2013도14510
공인중개사의업무및부동산거래신고에관한법률위반
Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The defendant's argument in the grounds of appeal is that the court below found the defendant guilty by finding wrong facts although the defendant did not lend the real estate agent name to G. The defendant's ground of appeal is unlawful.

However, the recognition of facts and the selection and evaluation of evidence, which are the premise thereof, belong to the exclusive authority of the fact-finding court unless it exceeds the limit of the free evaluation of evidence

The judgment below

In light of the record, the fact-finding by the court below is not recognized to have exceeded the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow