Text
1. Seoul Central District Court F, G, H, I (Dual), J (Consolidated), K, L (Dual), M, N(Consolidated) application cases for a compulsory auction.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On November 2002, O, including the new construction of the instant tenement house, newly constructed a apartment house consisting of 17 partitioned buildings on the ground of Q 327 square meters and R 198 square meters (hereinafter “each land of this case”) owned by the Plaintiffs and P (hereinafter “instant apartment house”). The registration of ownership preservation in the name of O was completed on September 26, 2008 upon commission of the registration of provisional attachment on the entire apartment house of this case.
B. 1) As Seoul Central District Court 2009Da114917, Defendant C filed a lawsuit against Defendant C with the Seoul Central District Court 2009Da114917, “Defendant C had to perform the procedure for cancellation of ownership transfer registration that was completed on October 1, 2008 by the Seoul Central District Court Dabuak Registry No. 45689, May 26, 201.” Defendant C appealed appealed with the Seoul Central District Court 201Na48164, and with the Seoul High Court 203 Dabu 20150, 300, 200 Dabu 2165, 300, 300, 300, 3000, 300 Dabu 2165, 2015, 203, 300, 300,000 Dabu 2165, 209, 2015.
3) As to the above appellate judgment, theO and the Defendant C appealed each of the Supreme Court Decision 2012Da37350 (main lawsuit), and 2012Da37367 (Counterclaim). However, the Supreme Court dismissed both the O and the Defendant C’s appeals on September 13, 2012, and accordingly, the said appellate judgment became final and conclusive (hereinafter “instant judgment”).