logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2013.08.22 2012고단639
업무상횡령등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2012 Highest 639]

1. The Defendant is an accounting employee of the victim D (President E) located in Asan City from June 15, 201 to February 21, 2012, who was engaged in the management of the material account books and accounting books of the said company. A.

On September 15, 2011, the Defendant arbitrarily withdrawn KRW 3 million from the corporate bank account in the name of D (owner) that the Defendant had kept in his/her business at an unsound place and used it individually.

B. On December 23, 2011, the Defendant arbitrarily transferred KRW 10 million from the corporate bank account under the name of the Defendant’s husband to the F’s new bank account, the husband of the Defendant, from the corporate bank account under the name of D (State) that the Defendant kept in his/her business at the above D office, to the Defendant’s new bank account under the name of F.

C. Around December 30, 2011, the Defendant arbitrarily transferred KRW 10 million from the corporate bank account under the name of the Defendant’s husband to the F’s national bank account, the husband of the Defendant, from the corporate bank account under the name of the State of D (State) that the Defendant kept in his/her business and used it individually.

On January 13, 2012, the Defendant arbitrarily transferred KRW 1,3120,00 to the company bank account in the name of G, which is an employee of the company bank account in the name of G, a member of the company bank account in the name of E in which the Defendant had kept in his/her business at the above D office, from January 13, 2012.

Accordingly, the Defendant embezzled the sum of KRW 3,612,00,000, which was kept on duty for the victim.

[2012 Highest 1045]

2. The Defendant is a victim D (the President E) accounting employee in Asan City from June 15, 201 to February 21, 2012, who was engaged in the said company’s financial management business. A.

The Defendant, from June 15, 201 to June 15, 201, where the bid price for auction goods is required at the above company’s office, has been kept in the custody of H’s deposit passbook (agricultural Cooperatives, I) and seal in the course of business for the said company, so that he can withdraw and use the money according to the direction of E, which is the president of the said company. The Defendant’s deposit passbook and seal are without obtaining permission from the Agricultural Cooperatives located in Asan City, around September 2, 2011.

arrow