The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower court in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have convicted all of the facts charged of the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and there was no error of misapprehending the legal doctrine on obscene materials in the crime of aiding and abetting and abetting the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc. (obscenity distribution) by exceeding the bounds of free fluorism in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by omitting judgment.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.