beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff’s monetary claim against C (A) on October 5, 2010, the Plaintiff referred to as “C, etc.” when referring to the above three names as the District Court 2010 Kahap10600 (C, etc.) and C, D, and E (hereinafter the above three names).
(2) On September 7, 2012, the above court rendered a judgment on September 7, 2012 that “C, etc. jointly and severally, shall pay to the Plaintiff 230,483,591 won and interest thereon at the rate of 5% per annum from January 12, 2011 to September 7, 2012, and at the rate of 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.” 2) Accordingly, C, etc. appealed appealed as Seoul High Court 2012Na76579, and the above court dismissed the part against C, etc. in excess of the subsequent order of payment on June 7, 2013, and all of the Plaintiff’s claims corresponding to the cancellation portion. C, etc. were jointly and severally announced to the Plaintiff at the rate of 210,563,591 won and interest rate of 10% per annum from January 12, 2011 to the date of full payment.”
B. The Plaintiff’s execution of the instant apartment and C’s donation 1) The instant apartment is real estate on February 13, 201, the ownership of which was acquired by C. The Plaintiff filed an application for a compulsory auction of real estate with the Ku Government District Court F with the title of execution on September 19, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for a compulsory auction of real estate with the Ku Government District Court F with the title of execution on September 19, 2012, but it was issued an order to explain that the Plaintiff is the same person on September 20, 2012 on the ground that the indication of C was different from that of the owner in the copy of the registry. (2) After the Plaintiff was issued an order to rectify “G” from the Seoul High Court on October 30, 2012 to “C,” and the written amendment was submitted to the Auction Court on November 5, 2012. However, Defendant 1 had already been issued on November 21, 2012.