logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.08.01 2014고단657
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CPoter 2 vehicles.

On October 1, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on October 15, 2015:47, and driven the road of 1 lane in front of the Kim Jong-si at the right angle D in front of the Kim Jong-si at the speed of about 60km from the direction of the Kim Jong-si to the direction of this document.

At the time, there was a new construction site on the right side of the road, and the opposite part was stopped at the price of 25 passenger buses, so there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is a person to reduce the speed and to see well, and to safely drive the motor vehicle in advance to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and found the victim E (50 years of age) who cross the above road to the right side from the left side due to the negligence of driving the road at the same speed, but did not avoid it and did not go beyond the ground by taking the right side of the above victim's vehicle back to the ground.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence such as cutting down the right-hand pelle, cutting down the pelle, cutting down the pelle, and brain pelle, etc., which require approximately 12 weeks of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, on-site evidence and photographs of the traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Despite the occurrence of the victim's bodily injury due to the traffic accident of this case, the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim and did not make a minimum deposit, and the instant vehicle is highly likely to criticize the Defendant in light of the following: (a) the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 12 of the Criminal Act on the grounds of sentencing of imprisonment without prison labor, the Defendant did not have reached an agreement with

arrow