logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.06.23 2017노242
대부업등의등록및금융이용자보호에관한법률위반등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the court below is too unreasonable as the punishment (amounting to five million won) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant committed the instant non-registered loan brokerage without being aware of the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence on the grounds that he was engaged in the unregistered loan brokerage business in 2013, and the Defendant again committed the instant non-registered loan brokerage business without being aware of the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence, but the amount of embezzlement damage was not at least KRW 14 million, but the injured party revoked the complaint against the Defendant, and the judgment on the B, an accomplice who violated the Loan Business Act, became final and conclusive and conclusive, which should take into account the equity of the punishment, and thus take into account all the sentencing conditions in the instant records and arguments in all favorable or unfavorable circumstances, the sentence imposed by the Defendant is deemed appropriate, and it cannot be deemed unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow