1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The summary of the case is the case where the plaintiff sought compensation for consolation money by asking state liability against the defendant for the reason that the prosecutor who is in charge of the plaintiff's accusation case unfairly detains the plaintiff as a non-prosecution, threatened the plaintiff with an additional criminal charge, thereby creating a false crime, and prosecuted as a concurrent crime.

On the premise of fact, on August 22, 2008, the plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with C, the father of B, and Seongbuk-gu Seoul, with a deposit of KRW 3 million and KRW 400,000,000 per month on the D branch.

C The Plaintiff did not pay the rent after January 9, 2009. On August 9, 2010, C filed a lawsuit (Seoul Central District Court 201Gahap27597) with the Plaintiff to deliver and pay rent real estate (Seoul Central District Court 201Gahap27597) and rendered a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff on August 19, 201, stating that “The Plaintiff shall deliver leased real estate to C and pay unpaid rent.”

On December 1, 2011, the enforcement officer E performed a compulsory execution on leased real estate according to the entrustment of compulsory execution based on the judgment of the above provisional execution sentence.

On April 5, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Gwanak Police Station with the Plaintiff, “E, in collusion with the lessor’s ASEAN, filed a complaint with the enforcement officer stating that “On December 1, 2011, E, in collusion with the lessor’s ASEAN 747 B, JV1080 sampling, Mami, 645 Camers and lensess, Samsung Videomers, and scambling machines, and then stolen a large number of goods.” On April 22, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a supplementary complaint with the official in charge of the police station, in collusion with the enforcement officer E, who is related with the lessor B, stated to the effect that “The Plaintiff stolen a large number of goods, such as the Plaintiff’s 244,270,000 pieces 747, JV10, 1080 piece of Articles 64 and 65,05,000.”

The above case is the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office in 2012.