logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.06.07 2018고정79
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Of the facts charged in the instant case, it is not guilty of violating the Road Traffic Act (the measures not taken after the accident). Of the facts charged in the instant case.

Reasons

1. The non-guilty portion - Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Measures not yet taken after the accident), and violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the compensation for the violation even);

A. On October 30, 2017, around 13:20, the Defendant driven a vehicle for CK5 passenger (hereinafter “victim”) with the two-lane of the 257-1 mountain road in the northwest-gu, Gwangju, and led the Defendant to drive the vehicle from the boundary of the new dong, along with the two-lane of the 257-1 mountain road. If it is likely to obstruct the passage of the vehicle in the case of changing the course, the Defendant shall not change the course, and when changing the course, the Defendant shall operate the direction light in advance and safely changed the way to prevent the accident from the smoke, despite the fact that he had a duty of care to change the course into the three-lane road course, the Defendant took part of the e-car (hereinafter “damaged vehicle”) with the direction of the vehicle due to the negligence of changing the course, and entered the part of the vehicle to the right side of the road in the indictment, but it is determined that the vehicle was damaged to the left side of the vehicle.

The victim suffered injuries, such as salt ties, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about 2 weeks, and at the same time, the damaged vehicle was damaged to the extent that the amount of 1,845,910 won was damaged to the extent that the damaged vehicle was damaged and escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the injured party.

B. Determination 1) According to the Defendant’s partial legal statement, witness D, and F’s respective legal statements and evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, the Defendant driven a sea-going vehicle around 13:20 on October 30, 2017, and proceeded into the 257-1 lane from the boundary line to the seat line of the Singdong-dong, Seogdong-gu, Gwangju, along with the two-lane of the 257-1 North Korean Peninsula, and changed the course to three-lane, while driving the sea-going vehicle on the right side of the damaged vehicle, the Defendant was driving the sea-going vehicle without stopping.

arrow