(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.04.28 2015가단35390

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.04.28 2015가단35390

불법행위로 인한 손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 1 million to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s 5% per annum from August 18, 2015 to April 28, 2016.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Fact 1) The Plaintiff and the Defendant are the members of the Diplomatic Association located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul). During the process of resolving the corruption problem of the previous pastor, the Diplomatic Association is divided into a church, and the conflict and anti-concept have deepened with the members, and the Plaintiff has been in charge of the film photographing at the site of the case of the Western church division in favor of the Defendant. 2) Meanwhile, on May 13, 2012, the Defendant was unable to enter the Defendant into the church before the Diplomatic Association, and the Plaintiff said that “the Plaintiff is a defect in the film photographing, and whether the Plaintiff is a large-scale fraud” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant insult”).

(B) In addition, on November 16, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 200,000 due to the offense of insult. The Defendant reported that the Plaintiff was taking a video tape within the Diplomatic Dogs of Diplomatic 10:35 on November 16, 2012, and that the Defendant was dissatisfied with the Defendant’s payment of a fine as the day when the Plaintiff insulting the Plaintiff, and that “the Plaintiff was a good person to have a fine of KRW 500,00,00,000,” and the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 30,000 due to the Defendant’s assault (hereinafter “instant assault”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, since the defendant committed an illegal act, such as insulting and assaulting the plaintiff, the defendant is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the plaintiff.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. The Plaintiff asserts that the above tort committed by the Defendant that the part of the Plaintiff’s video camera damage damaged the part of the Plaintiff’s video camera recording, and that the Plaintiff sustained damages of KRW 500,000 by loss of micro-protection punchers.

Modern, Modern, and recognized earlier.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.01.16 2012고정137

-인천지방법원 2019.05.16 2018고정1744

-대구지방법원 2014.05.09 2014고정213

-서울북부지방법원 2013.01.03 2012고정2698

-서울북부지방법원 2013.09.06 2013고정285