(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.12.11 2013고단1852

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.12.11 2013고단1852

업무상과실치상

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person in charge of overall management and supervision of the safety of equipment and workers at the site of installation of other workshops, the director in charge of management of the C Co., Ltd. that installs, dismantles, and operates other workshops, and at the site of installation of other workshops at a female-si D apartment.

At around 11:20 on January 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) ordered the victim E, etc. to perform the work of loading and unloading “wait”, which is equipment to maintain balance between the victim E, etc. at the site of the installation of the above workshop (or loading, unloading, or installing, cream 4.5 tons of concrete at one end of the workshop, installed at one end of the other).

Since the loading and unloading work of wait takes place by clers, there is a possibility that clers will fall off or go up with wait one another, the defendant, who is in charge of the field supervision, has a duty of care to provide prior education so that the defendant, who is in charge of the field supervision, may not access the surrounding area of wait or wait to the workers participating in the loading and unloading, and to prevent the workers from entering the site of wait and monitoring the work from entering the direction of wait around wait or wait in order to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not properly educate the victim, who is on-site workers, in advance, and neglected to enter the direction of wait to assist the victim with loading and unloading of wait by cros, and neglected to work in the direction of wait to do so, and caused wait to go beyond the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the right arms and the right bridge cutting, which require treatment for about 16 weeks from the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant 1.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2015.11.24 2014노3112

-청주지방법원 제천지원 2021.04.15 2020가합10131

-부산지방법원 2015.10.30 2015나3935

-창원지방법원마산지원 2017.12.28 2016가단9592

-청주지방법원 제천지원 2021.01.28 2020고단446