logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.06.20 2013고단344
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the violation of the Road Traffic Act are those who are engaged in the operation of the CBelgium car.

On October 11, 2012, the Defendant driving the above vehicle at around 20:35, while proceeding one lane from the two-lanes of the shooting distance in Kimhae-si and the north-dong, from the outer elementary school to the second apartment of Korea. At that time, at that time, the Defendant was obliged to take a duty of care in the safe way after checking the right and the right and the right through the private intersection where signal, etc. is installed, and accurately operating the steering direction and the brake system, and accurately operating it in a safe way.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and was negligent in proceeding immediately before the Defendant’s vehicle driving direction and received the back portion of the E-learning car driving in front of the Defendant’s vehicle driving in front of the Defendant’s vehicle driving direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused 702,770 won to repair the victim’s vehicle by using the frier exchange, etc. on the part of the victim’s vehicle due to the foregoing occupational negligence, and suffered injury to the victim, such as climatic salt, tension, etc. for about three weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, and operated the said vehicle at a distance of about 300 meters from the post office behind the road located in the Kimhae-si without a driver’s license to the front of the road of the same spawn.

3. While a person violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is prohibited from operating an automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance, the Defendant driven the said vehicle at the same time and place as that of the preceding paragraph, as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a actual investigation report on a traffic accident;

1. Two copies of photographs, such as damaged vehicles;

1. The ledger of driver's licenses and mandatory insurance;

1. A copy of a medical certificate;

arrow