The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The penalty of the lower court on the summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, observation of protection, additional collection KRW 18 million) is too excessive and unfair.

2. The lower court determined that the Defendant stated at the police that he/she would distribute the profits of his/her and sexual traffic women at an average of 3:7, and that the average daily income was earned at KRW 60 million in total as KRW 1,000,000 in operating a sexual traffic business establishment for about two months.

In the statement, the above 60 million won was calculated as the defendant's profit. According to the evidence duly adopted by the court below, the above calculation of the additional collection charge by the court below is just and there is an error of law in this regard.

The defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.